Random wanderings through Microsoft Azure esp. PaaS plumbing, the IoT bits, AI on Micro controllers, AI on Edge Devices, .NET nanoFramework, .NET Core on *nix and ML.NET+ONNX
public class IoTHubApplicationSetting
{
public string DtdlModelId { get; set; }
}
public class IoTHubSettings
{
public string IoTHubConnectionString { get; set; } = string.Empty;
public Dictionary<string, IoTHubApplicationSetting> Applications { get; set; }
}
public class DeviceProvisiongServiceApplicationSetting
{
public string DtdlModelId { get; set; } = string.Empty;
public string GroupEnrollmentKey { get; set; } = string.Empty;
}
public class DeviceProvisiongServiceSettings
{
public string IdScope { get; set; } = string.Empty;
public Dictionary<string, DeviceProvisiongServiceApplicationSetting> Applications { get; set; }
}
public class IoTCentralMethodSetting
{
public byte Port { get; set; } = 0;
public bool Confirmed { get; set; } = false;
public Models.DownlinkPriority Priority { get; set; } = Models.DownlinkPriority.Normal;
public Models.DownlinkQueue Queue { get; set; } = Models.DownlinkQueue.Replace;
}
public class IoTCentralSetting
{
public Dictionary<string, IoTCentralMethodSetting> Methods { get; set; }
}
public class AzureIoTSettings
{
public IoTHubSettings IoTHub { get; set; }
public DeviceProvisiongServiceSettings DeviceProvisioningService { get; set; }
public IoTCentralSetting IoTCentral { get; set; }
}
Azure IoT Central appears to have no support for setting message properties so the LoRaWAN port, confirmed flag, priority, and queuing so these a retrieved from configuration.
Azure Function Configuration
Models.Downlink downlink;
Models.DownlinkQueue queue;
string payloadText = Encoding.UTF8.GetString(message.GetBytes()).Trim();
if (message.Properties.ContainsKey("method-name"))
{
#region Azure IoT Central C2D message processing
string methodName = message.Properties["method-name"];
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(methodName))
{
_logger.LogWarning("Downlink-DeviceID:{0} MessagedID:{1} LockToken:{2} method-name property empty", receiveMessageHandlerContext.DeviceId, message.MessageId, message.LockToken);
await deviceClient.RejectAsync(message);
return;
}
// Look up the method settings to get confirmed, port, priority, and queue
if ((_azureIoTSettings == null) || (_azureIoTSettings.IoTCentral == null) || !_azureIoTSettings.IoTCentral.Methods.TryGetValue(methodName, out IoTCentralMethodSetting methodSetting))
{
_logger.LogWarning("Downlink-DeviceID:{0} MessagedID:{1} LockToken:{2} method-name:{3} has no settings", receiveMessageHandlerContext.DeviceId, message.MessageId, message.LockToken, methodName);
await deviceClient.RejectAsync(message);
return;
}
downlink = new Models.Downlink()
{
Confirmed = methodSetting.Confirmed,
Priority = methodSetting.Priority,
Port = methodSetting.Port,
CorrelationIds = AzureLockToken.Add(message.LockToken),
};
queue = methodSetting.Queue;
// Check to see if special case for Azure IoT central command with no request payload
if (payloadText.IsPayloadEmpty())
{
downlink.PayloadRaw = "";
}
if (!payloadText.IsPayloadEmpty())
{
if (payloadText.IsPayloadValidJson())
{
downlink.PayloadDecoded = JToken.Parse(payloadText);
}
else
{
downlink.PayloadDecoded = new JObject(new JProperty(methodName, payloadText));
}
}
logger.LogInformation("Downlink-IoT Central DeviceID:{0} Method:{1} MessageID:{2} LockToken:{3} Port:{4} Confirmed:{5} Priority:{6} Queue:{7}",
receiveMessageHandlerContext.DeviceId,
methodName,
message.MessageId,
message.LockToken,
downlink.Port,
downlink.Confirmed,
downlink.Priority,
queue);
#endregion
}
The reboot command payload only contains an “@” so the TTTI payload will be empty, the minimum and maximum command payloads will contain only a numeric value which is added to the decoded payload with the method name, the combined minimum and maximum command has a JSON payload which is “grafted” into the decoded payload.
TTI Webhook Integration running in desktop emulator
In the Visual Studio 2019 Debugger the exception text was “IsTransient = true” so I went and made a coffee and tried again.
Visual Studio 2019 Quickwatch displaying short from error message
The call was still failing so I dumped out the exception text so I had some key words to search for
Microsoft.Azure.Devices.Provisioning.Client.ProvisioningTransportException: AMQP transport exception
---> System.UnauthorizedAccessException: Sys
at Microsoft.Azure.Amqp.ExceptionDispatcher.Throw(Exception exception)
at Microsoft.Azure.Amqp.AsyncResult.End[TAsyncResult](IAsyncResult result)
at Microsoft.Azure.Amqp.AmqpObject.OpenAsyncResult.End(IAsyncResult result)
at Microsoft.Azure.Amqp.AmqpObject.EndOpen(IAsyncResult result)
at Microsoft.Azure.Amqp.Transport.AmqpTransportInitiator.HandleTransportOpened(IAsyncResult result)
at Microsoft.Azure.Amqp.Transport.AmqpTransportInitiator.OnTransportOpenCompete(IAsyncResult result)
--- End of stack trace from previous location ---
at Microsoft.Azure.Devices.Provisioning.Client.Transport.AmqpClientConnection.OpenAsync(TimeSpan timeout, Boolean useWebSocket, X509Certificate2 clientCert, IWebProxy proxy, RemoteCertificateValidationCallback remoteCerificateValidationCallback)
at Microsoft.Azure.Devices.Provisioning.Client.Transport.ProvisioningTransportHandlerAmqp.RegisterAsync(ProvisioningTransportRegisterMessage message, TimeSpan timeout, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at Microsoft.Azure.Devices.Provisioning.Client.Transport.ProvisioningTransportHandlerAmqp.RegisterAsync(ProvisioningTransportRegisterMessage message, TimeSpan timeout, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
at Microsoft.Azure.Devices.Provisioning.Client.Transport.ProvisioningTransportHandlerAmqp.RegisterAsync(ProvisioningTransportRegisterMessage message, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
at devMobile.IoT.TheThingsIndustries.AzureIoTHub.Integration.Uplink(HttpRequestData req, FunctionContext executionContext) in C:\Users\BrynLewis\source\repos\TTIV3AzureIoTConnector\TTIV3WebHookAzureIoTHubIntegration\TTIUplinkHandler.cs:line 245
I then tried another program which did used the Device provisioning Service and it worked first time so it was something wrong with the code.
using (var securityProvider = new SecurityProviderSymmetricKey(deviceId, deviceKey, null))
{
using (var transport = new ProvisioningTransportHandlerAmqp(TransportFallbackType.TcpOnly))
{
DeviceRegistrationResult result;
ProvisioningDeviceClient provClient = ProvisioningDeviceClient.Create(
Constants.AzureDpsGlobalDeviceEndpoint,
dpsApplicationSetting.GroupEnrollmentKey, <<= Should be _azureIoTSettings.DeviceProvisioningService.IdScope,
securityProvider,
transport);
try
{
result = await provClient.RegisterAsync();
}
catch (ProvisioningTransportException ex)
{
logger.LogInformation(ex, "Uplink-DeviceID:{0} RegisterAsync failed IDScope and/or GroupEnrollmentKey invalid", deviceId);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.Unauthorized);
}
if (result.Status != ProvisioningRegistrationStatusType.Assigned)
{
_logger.LogError("Uplink-DeviceID:{0} Status:{1} RegisterAsync failed ", deviceId, result.Status);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.FailedDependency);
}
IAuthenticationMethod authentication = new DeviceAuthenticationWithRegistrySymmetricKey(result.DeviceId, (securityProvider as SecurityProviderSymmetricKey).GetPrimaryKey());
deviceClient = DeviceClient.Create(result.AssignedHub, authentication, TransportSettings);
await deviceClient.OpenAsync();
logger.LogInformation("Uplink-DeviceID:{0} Azure IoT Hub connected (Device Provisioning Service)", deviceId);
}
}
I then carefully inspected my source code and worked back through the file history and realised I had accidentally replaced the IDScope with the GroupEnrollment setting so it was never going to work i.e. IsTransient != true. So, for the one or two other people who get this error message check your IDScope and GroupEnrollment key make sure they are the right variables and that values they contain are correct.
The Azure IoT Central Location Telemetry messages have a slightly different format to the output of the TTI LPP Payload formatter so the payload has to be “post processed”.
private void EnumerateChildren(JObject jobject, JToken token)
{
if (token is JProperty property)
{
if (token.First is JValue)
{
// Temporary dirty hack for Azure IoT Central compatibility
if (token.Parent is JObject possibleGpsProperty)
{
// TODO Need to check if similar approach necessary accelerometer and gyro LPP payloads
if (possibleGpsProperty.Path.StartsWith("GPS_", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
{
if (string.Compare(property.Name, "Latitude", true) == 0)
{
jobject.Add("lat", property.Value);
}
if (string.Compare(property.Name, "Longitude", true) == 0)
{
jobject.Add("lon", property.Value);
}
if (string.Compare(property.Name, "Altitude", true) == 0)
{
jobject.Add("alt", property.Value);
}
}
}
jobject.Add(property.Name, property.Value);
}
else
{
JObject parentObject = new JObject();
foreach (JToken token2 in token.Children())
{
EnumerateChildren(parentObject, token2);
jobject.Add(property.Name, parentObject);
}
}
}
else
{
foreach (JToken token2 in token.Children())
{
EnumerateChildren(jobject, token2);
}
}
}
I may have to extend this method for other LPP datatypes
“Post processed” TTI JSON GPS Position data suitable for Azure IoT Central
Azure IoT Central Device Template with Location Capability
For initial development and testing I ran the function application in the desktop emulator and simulated TTI webhook calls with Telerik Fiddler and modified sample payloads. After some issues with iothub-creation-time-utc decoded telemetry messages were displayed in the Device Raw Data tab
Azure IoT Central Device Raw Data tab with successfully decoded GPS location payloads
Azure IoT Central map displaying with device location highlighted
The TTI V3 Connector Minimalist Cloud to Device only required a port number, and there was no way to specify whether delivery of message had to be confirmed, the way the message was queued, or the priority of message delivery. Like the port number these optional settings can be specified in message properties.
If any of these properties are incorrect DeviceClient.RejectAsync is called which deletes the message from the device queue and indicates to the server that the message could not be processed.
private async Task AzureIoTHubClientReceiveMessageHandler(Message message, object userContext)
{
try
{
Models.AzureIoTHubReceiveMessageHandlerContext receiveMessageHandlerContext = (Models.AzureIoTHubReceiveMessageHandlerContext)userContext;
if (!_DeviceClients.TryGetValue(receiveMessageHandlerContext.DeviceId, out DeviceClient deviceClient))
{
_logger.LogWarning("Downlink-DeviceID:{0} unknown", receiveMessageHandlerContext.DeviceId);
return;
}
using (message)
{
string payloadText = Encoding.UTF8.GetString(message.GetBytes()).Trim();
if (!AzureDownlinkMessage.PortTryGet(message.Properties, out byte port))
{
_logger.LogWarning("Downlink-Port property is invalid");
await deviceClient.RejectAsync(message);
return;
}
if (!AzureDownlinkMessage.ConfirmedTryGet(message.Properties, out bool confirmed))
{
_logger.LogWarning("Downlink-Confirmed flag is invalid");
await deviceClient.RejectAsync(message);
return;
}
if (!AzureDownlinkMessage.PriorityTryGet(message.Properties, out Models.DownlinkPriority priority))
{
_logger.LogWarning("Downlink-Priority value is invalid");
await deviceClient.RejectAsync(message);
return;
}
if (!AzureDownlinkMessage.QueueTryGet(message.Properties, out Models.DownlinkQueue queue))
{
_logger.LogWarning("Downlink-Queue value is invalid");
await deviceClient.RejectAsync(message.LockToken);
return;
}
Models.Downlink downlink = new Models.Downlink()
{
Confirmed = confirmed,
Priority = priority,
Port = port,
CorrelationIds = AzureLockToken.Add(message.LockToken),
};
// Split over multiple lines in an attempt to improve readability. In this scenario a valid JSON string should start/end with {/} for an object or [/] for an array
if ((payloadText.StartsWith("{") && payloadText.EndsWith("}"))
||
((payloadText.StartsWith("[") && payloadText.EndsWith("]"))))
{
try
{
downlink.PayloadDecoded = JToken.Parse(payloadText);
}
catch (JsonReaderException)
{
downlink.PayloadRaw = payloadText;
}
}
else
{
downlink.PayloadRaw = payloadText;
}
_logger.LogInformation("Downlink-IoT Hub DeviceID:{0} MessageID:{2} LockToken:{3} Port:{4} Confirmed:{5} Priority:{6} Queue:{7}",
receiveMessageHandlerContext.DeviceId,
message.MessageId,
message.LockToken,
downlink.Port,
downlink.Confirmed,
downlink.Priority,
queue);
Models.DownlinkPayload Payload = new Models.DownlinkPayload()
{
Downlinks = new List<Models.Downlink>()
{
downlink
}
};
string url = $"{receiveMessageHandlerContext.WebhookBaseURL}/{receiveMessageHandlerContext.ApplicationId}/webhooks/{receiveMessageHandlerContext.WebhookId}/devices/{receiveMessageHandlerContext.DeviceId}/down/{queue}".ToLower();
using (var client = new WebClient())
{
client.Headers.Add("Authorization", $"Bearer {receiveMessageHandlerContext.ApiKey}");
client.UploadString(new Uri(url), JsonConvert.SerializeObject(Payload));
}
_logger.LogInformation("Downlink-DeviceID:{0} LockToken:{1} success", receiveMessageHandlerContext.DeviceId, message.LockToken);
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
_logger.LogError(ex, "Downlink-ReceiveMessge processing failed");
}
}
A correlation identifier containing the Message LockToken is added to the downlink payload.
Unconfirmed Downlink Messages
Azure IoT Explorer Cloud to Device sending an unconfirmed downlink message
For unconfirmed messages The TTI Connector calls the DeviceClient.CompletedAsync method (with the LockToken from the CorrelationIDs list) which deletes the message from the device queue.
[Function("Queued")]
public async Task<HttpResponseData> Queued([HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Function, "post")] HttpRequestData req, FunctionContext executionContext)
{
var logger = executionContext.GetLogger("Queued");
// Wrap all the processing in a try\catch so if anything blows up we have logged it.
try
{
string payloadText = await req.ReadAsStringAsync();
Models.DownlinkQueuedPayload payload = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Models.DownlinkQueuedPayload>(payloadText);
if (payload == null)
{
logger.LogInformation("Queued-Payload {0} invalid", payloadText);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest);
}
string applicationId = payload.EndDeviceIds.ApplicationIds.ApplicationId;
string deviceId = payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceId;
logger.LogInformation("Queued-ApplicationID:{0} DeviceID:{1} ", applicationId, deviceId);
if (!_DeviceClients.TryGetValue(deviceId, out DeviceClient deviceClient))
{
logger.LogInformation("Queued-Unknown device for ApplicationID:{0} DeviceID:{1}", applicationId, deviceId);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.Conflict);
}
// If the message is not confirmed "complete" it as soon as with network
if (!payload.DownlinkQueued.Confirmed)
{
if (!AzureLockToken.TryGet(payload.DownlinkQueued.CorrelationIds, out string lockToken))
{
logger.LogWarning("Queued-DeviceID:{0} LockToken missing from payload:{1}", payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceId, payloadText);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest);
}
try
{
await deviceClient.CompleteAsync(lockToken);
}
catch (DeviceMessageLockLostException)
{
logger.LogWarning("Queued-CompleteAsync DeviceID:{0} LockToken:{1} timeout", payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceId, lockToken);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.Conflict);
}
logger.LogInformation("Queued-DeviceID:{0} LockToken:{1} success", payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceId, lockToken);
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
logger.LogError(ex, "Queued message processing failed");
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError);
}
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK);
}
The Things Industries Live Data tab for an unconfirmed message-Queued
Azure Application Insights for an unconfirmed message
The Things Industries Live Data tab for an unconfirmed message-Sent
Confirmed Downlink Messages
Azure IoT Explorer Cloud to Device sending a confirmed downlink message
Azure Application Insights for a confirmed message
The Things Industries Live Data tab for a confirmed message-Sent
The Things Industries Live Data tab for a confirmed message-Ack
If message delivery succeeds the deviceClient.CompleteAsync method (with the LockToken from the CorrelationIDs list) is called which removes the message from the device queue.
[Function("Ack")]
public async Task<HttpResponseData> Ack([HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Function, "post")] HttpRequestData req, FunctionContext executionContext)
{
var logger = executionContext.GetLogger("Queued");
// Wrap all the processing in a try\catch so if anything blows up we have logged it.
try
{
string payloadText = await req.ReadAsStringAsync();
Models.DownlinkAckPayload payload = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Models.DownlinkAckPayload>(payloadText);
if (payload == null)
{
logger.LogInformation("Ack-Payload {0} invalid", payloadText);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest);
}
string applicationId = payload.EndDeviceIds.ApplicationIds.ApplicationId;
string deviceId = payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceId;
logger.LogInformation("Ack-ApplicationID:{0} DeviceID:{1} ", applicationId, deviceId);
if (!_DeviceClients.TryGetValue(deviceId, out DeviceClient deviceClient))
{
logger.LogInformation("Ack-Unknown device for ApplicationID:{0} DeviceID:{1}", applicationId, deviceId);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.Conflict);
}
if (!AzureLockToken.TryGet(payload.DownlinkAck.CorrelationIds, out string lockToken))
{
logger.LogWarning("Ack-DeviceID:{0} LockToken missing from payload:{1}", payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceId, payloadText);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest);
}
try
{
await deviceClient.CompleteAsync(lockToken);
}
catch (DeviceMessageLockLostException)
{
logger.LogWarning("Ack-CompleteAsync DeviceID:{0} LockToken:{1} timeout", payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceId, lockToken);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.Conflict);
}
logger.LogInformation("Ack-DeviceID:{0} LockToken:{1} success", payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceId, lockToken);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
logger.LogError(ex, "Ack message processing failed");
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError);
}
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK);
}
Azure Application Insights for an confirmed message Ack
If message delivery fails the deviceClient.AbandonAsync method (with the LockToken from the CorrelationIDs list) is called which puts the downlink message back onto the device queue.
[Function("Failed")]
public async Task<HttpResponseData> Failed([HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Function, "post")] HttpRequestData req, FunctionContext executionContext)
{
var logger = executionContext.GetLogger("Queued");
// Wrap all the processing in a try\catch so if anything blows up we have logged it.
try
{
string payloadText = await req.ReadAsStringAsync();
Models.DownlinkFailedPayload payload = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Models.DownlinkFailedPayload>(payloadText);
if (payload == null)
{
logger.LogInformation("Failed-Payload {0} invalid", payloadText);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest);
}
string applicationId = payload.EndDeviceIds.ApplicationIds.ApplicationId;
string deviceId = payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceId;
logger.LogInformation("Failed-ApplicationID:{0} DeviceID:{1} ", applicationId, deviceId);
if (!_DeviceClients.TryGetValue(deviceId, out DeviceClient deviceClient))
{
logger.LogInformation("Failed-Unknown device for ApplicationID:{0} DeviceID:{1}", applicationId, deviceId);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.Conflict);
}
if (!AzureLockToken.TryGet(payload.DownlinkFailed.CorrelationIds, out string lockToken))
{
logger.LogWarning("Failed-DeviceID:{0} LockToken missing from payload:{1}", payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceId, payloadText);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest);
}
try
{
await deviceClient.RejectAsync(lockToken);
}
catch (DeviceMessageLockLostException)
{
logger.LogWarning("Failed-RejectAsync DeviceID:{0} LockToken:{1} timeout", payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceId, lockToken);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.Conflict);
}
logger.LogInformation("Failed-DeviceID:{0} LockToken:{1} success", payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceId, lockToken);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
logger.LogError(ex, "Failed message processing failed");
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError);
}
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK);
}
If message delivery is unsuccessful the deviceClient.RejectAsync method (with the LockToken from the CorrelationIDs list) is called which deletes the message from the device queue and indicates to the server that the message could not be processed.
[Function("Nack")]
public async Task<HttpResponseData> Nack([HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Function, "post")] HttpRequestData req, FunctionContext executionContext)
{
var logger = executionContext.GetLogger("Queued");
// Wrap all the processing in a try\catch so if anything blows up we have logged it.
try
{
string payloadText = await req.ReadAsStringAsync();
Models.DownlinkNackPayload payload = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Models.DownlinkNackPayload>(payloadText);
if (payload == null)
{
logger.LogInformation("Nack-Payload {0} invalid", payloadText);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest);
}
string applicationId = payload.EndDeviceIds.ApplicationIds.ApplicationId;
string deviceId = payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceId;
logger.LogInformation("Nack-ApplicationID:{0} DeviceID:{1} ", applicationId, deviceId);
if (!_DeviceClients.TryGetValue(deviceId, out DeviceClient deviceClient))
{
logger.LogInformation("Nack-Unknown device for ApplicationID:{0} DeviceID:{1}", applicationId, deviceId);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.Conflict);
}
if (!AzureLockToken.TryGet(payload.DownlinkNack.CorrelationIds, out string lockToken))
{
logger.LogWarning("Nack-DeviceID:{0} LockToken missing from payload:{1}", payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceId, payloadText);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest);
}
try
{
await deviceClient.RejectAsync(lockToken);
}
catch (DeviceMessageLockLostException)
{
logger.LogWarning("Nack-RejectAsync DeviceID:{0} LockToken:{1} timeout", payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceId, lockToken);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.Conflict);
}
logger.LogInformation("Nack-DeviceID:{0} LockToken:{1} success", payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceId, lockToken);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
logger.LogError(ex, "Nack message processing failed");
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError);
}
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK);
}
The way message Failed(Abandon), Ack(CompleteAsync) and Nack(RejectAsync) are handled needs some more testing to confirm my understanding of the sequencing of TTI confirmed message delivery.
BEWARE
The use of Confirmed messaging with devices that send uplink messages irregularly can cause weird problems if the Azure IoT hub downlink message times out.
public partial class Webhooks
{
[Function("Uplink")]
public async Task<HttpResponseData> Uplink([HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Function, "post")] HttpRequestData req, FunctionContext executionContext)
{
var logger = executionContext.GetLogger("Uplink");
// Wrap all the processing in a try\catch so if anything blows up we have logged it. Will need to specialise for connectivity failues etc.
try
{
Models.PayloadUplink payload = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Models.PayloadUplink>(await req.ReadAsStringAsync());
if (payload == null)
{
logger.LogInformation("Uplink: Payload {0} invalid", await req.ReadAsStringAsync());
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest);
}
string applicationId = payload.EndDeviceIds.ApplicationIds.ApplicationId;
string deviceId = payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceId;
if ((payload.UplinkMessage.Port == null ) || (!payload.UplinkMessage.Port.HasValue) || (payload.UplinkMessage.Port.Value == 0))
{
logger.LogInformation("Uplink-ApplicationID:{0} DeviceID:{1} Payload Raw:{2} Control nessage", applicationId, deviceId, payload.UplinkMessage.PayloadRaw);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest);
}
int port = payload.UplinkMessage.Port.Value;
logger.LogInformation("Uplink-ApplicationID:{0} DeviceID:{1} Port:{2} Payload Raw:{3}", applicationId, deviceId, port, payload.UplinkMessage.PayloadRaw);
if (!_DeviceClients.TryGetValue(deviceId, out DeviceClient deviceClient))
{
logger.LogInformation("Uplink-Unknown device for ApplicationID:{0} DeviceID:{1}", applicationId, deviceId);
deviceClient = DeviceClient.CreateFromConnectionString(_configuration.GetConnectionString("AzureIoTHub"), deviceId);
try
{
await deviceClient.OpenAsync();
}
catch (DeviceNotFoundException)
{
logger.LogWarning("Uplink-Unknown DeviceID:{0}", deviceId);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.NotFound);
}
if (!_DeviceClients.TryAdd(deviceId, deviceClient))
{
logger.LogWarning("Uplink-TryAdd failed for ApplicationID:{0} DeviceID:{1}", applicationId, deviceId);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.Conflict);
}
}
JObject telemetryEvent = new JObject
{
{ "ApplicationID", applicationId },
{ "DeviceID", deviceId },
{ "Port", port },
{ "PayloadRaw", payload.UplinkMessage.PayloadRaw }
};
// If the payload has been decoded by payload formatter, put it in the message body.
if (payload.UplinkMessage.PayloadDecoded != null)
{
telemetryEvent.Add("PayloadDecoded", payload.UplinkMessage.PayloadDecoded);
}
// Send the message to Azure IoT Hub
using (Message ioTHubmessage = new Message(Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(telemetryEvent))))
{
// Ensure the displayed time is the acquired time rather than the uploaded time.
ioTHubmessage.Properties.Add("iothub-creation-time-utc", payload.UplinkMessage.ReceivedAtUtc.ToString("s", CultureInfo.InvariantCulture));
ioTHubmessage.Properties.Add("ApplicationId", applicationId);
ioTHubmessage.Properties.Add("DeviceEUI", payload.EndDeviceIds.DeviceEui);
ioTHubmessage.Properties.Add("DeviceId", deviceId);
ioTHubmessage.Properties.Add("port", port.ToString());
await deviceClient.SendEventAsync(ioTHubmessage);
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
logger.LogError(ex, "Uplink message processing failed");
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError);
}
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK);
}
}
For initial development and testing I ran the function application in the desktop emulator and simulated TTI webhook calls with Telerik Fiddler and modified TTI sample payloads.
I then used Azure IoT Explorer to configure devices, view uplink traffic etc. When I connected to my Azure IoT Hub shortly after starting the application all the devices were disconnected.
Azure IoT Explorer – no connected devices
The SeeeduinoLoRaWAN devices report roughly every 15 minutes so it took a while for them all to connect. (the SeeeduinoLoRaWAN4 & SeeeduinoLoRaWAN6 need to be repaired) .
After some experimentation I realised that I had forgotten that the order of message processing was important e.g. a TTI Queued message should be processed before the associated Ack. This could (and did happen) because I had a queue for each message type and in addition the Azure Queue Storage trigger binding would use parallel execution to process backlogs of messages. My approach caused issues with both intra and inter queue message ordering
namespace devMobile.IoT.TheThingsIndustries.HttpInputStorageQueueOutput
{
using System.Net;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Microsoft.Azure.Functions.Worker;
using Microsoft.Azure.Functions.Worker.Http;
using Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;
[StorageAccount("AzureWebJobsStorage")]
public static class Webhooks
{
[Function("Uplink")]
public static async Task<HttpTriggerUplinkOutputBindingType> Uplink([HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Function, "post")] HttpRequestData req, FunctionContext context)
{
var logger = context.GetLogger("UplinkMessage");
logger.LogInformation("Uplink processed");
var response = req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK);
return new HttpTriggerUplinkOutputBindingType()
{
Name = await req.ReadAsStringAsync(),
HttpReponse = response
};
}
public class HttpTriggerUplinkOutputBindingType
{
[QueueOutput("uplink")]
public string Name { get; set; }
public HttpResponseData HttpReponse { get; set; }
}
...
[Function("Failed")]
public static async Task<HttpTriggerFailedOutputBindingType> Failed([HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Function, "post")] HttpRequestData req, FunctionContext context)
{
var logger = context.GetLogger("Failed");
logger.LogInformation("Failed procssed");
var response = req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK);
return new HttpTriggerFailedOutputBindingType()
{
Name = await req.ReadAsStringAsync(),
HttpReponse = response
};
}
public class HttpTriggerFailedOutputBindingType
{
[QueueOutput("failed")]
public string Name { get; set; }
public HttpResponseData HttpReponse { get; set; }
}
}
}
Azure Functions Desktop Development environment running my functions
I used Telerik Fiddler with some sample payloads to test my application.
Telerik Fiddler Request Composer “posting” sample message to desktop endpoint
Once the functions were running reliably on my desktop, I created an Azure Service Plan, deployed the code, then generated an API Key for securing my HTTPTrigger endpoints.
Azure Functions Host Key configuration dialog
I then added a TTI Webhook Integration to my TTI SeeduinoLoRaWAN application, manually configured the endpoint, enabled the different messages I wanted to process and set the x-functions-key header.
TTI Application Webhook configuration
After a short delay I could see messages in the message uplink queue with Azure Storage Explorer
Azure Storage Explorer displaying content of my uplink queue
Building a new version of my TTIV3 Azure IoT connector is a useful learning exercise but I’m still deciding whether is it worth the effort as TTI has one now?
As part of my “day job” I spend a lot of time working with C# and VB.Net 4.X “legacy” projects doing upgrades, bugs fixes and moving applications to Azure. For the last couple of months I have been working on a project replacing Microsoft message queue(MSMQ) queues with Azure Storage Queues so the solution is easier to deploy in Azure.
The next phase of the project is to replace a number of Windows Services with Azure Queue Trigger and Timer Trigger functions. The aim is a series of small steps which we can test before deployment rather than major changes, hence the use of V1 Azure functions for the first release.
Silver Fox systems sells a Visual Studio extension which generates an HTTP Trigger VB.Net project. I needed Timer and Queue Trigger functions so I created C# examples and then used them to figure out how to build VB.Net equivalents
Visual Studio Solution Explorer
After quite a few failed attempts I found this sequence worked for me
Add a new VB.Net class library
Provide a name for new class library
Select target framework
Even though the target platform is not .NET 5.0 ignore this and continue.
Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Functions
Added Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Functions (make sure version 1.0.38)
At this point the project should compile but won’t do much, so update the class to look like the code below.
Imports System.Threading
Imports Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs
Imports Microsoft.Extensions.Logging
Public Class TimerTrigger
Shared executionCount As Int32
<FunctionName("Timer")>
Public Shared Sub Run(<TimerTrigger("0 */1 * * * *")> myTimer As TimerInfo, log As ILogger)
Interlocked.Increment(executionCount)
log.LogInformation("VB.Net TimerTrigger next trigger:{0} Execution count:{1}", myTimer.ScheduleStatus.Next, executionCount)
End Sub
End Class
Then add an empty hosts.json file (make sure “copy if newer” is configured in properties) to the project directory, then depending on deployment model configure the AzureWebJobsStorage and AzureWebJobsDashboard connection strings via environment variables or a local.settings.json file.
Visual Studio Environment variables for AzureWebJobsStorage and AzureWebJobsDashboard connection strings
Imports System.IO
Imports System.Threading
Imports Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs
Imports Microsoft.Extensions.Logging
Public Class BlobTrigger
Shared executionCount As Int32
' This function will get triggered/executed when a new message is written on an Azure Queue called events.
<FunctionName("Notifications")>
Public Shared Async Sub Run(<BlobTrigger("notifications/{name}", Connection:="BlobEndPoint")> payload As Stream, name As String, log As ILogger)
Interlocked.Increment(executionCount)
log.LogInformation("VB.Net BlobTrigger processed blob name:{0} Size:{1} bytes Execution count:{2}", name, payload.Length, executionCount)
End Sub
End Class
Imports System.Net
Imports System.Net.Http
Imports System.Threading
Imports Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs
Imports Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs.Extensions.Http
Imports Microsoft.Extensions.Logging
Public Class HttpTrigger
Shared executionCount As Int32
<FunctionName("Notifications")>
Public Shared Async Function Run(<HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Anonymous, "get", "post", Route:=Nothing)> req As HttpRequestMessage, log As ILogger) As Task(Of HttpResponseMessage)
Interlocked.Increment(executionCount)
log.LogInformation($"VB.Net HTTP trigger Execution count:{0} Method:{1}", executionCount, req.Method)
Return New HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.OK)
End Function
End Class
Imports System.Threading
Imports Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs
Imports Microsoft.Extensions.Logging
Public Class QueueTrigger
Shared ConcurrencyCount As Long
Shared ExecutionCount As Long
<FunctionName("Alerts")>
Public Shared Sub ProcessQueueMessage(<QueueTrigger("notifications", Connection:="QueueEndpoint")> message As String, log As ILogger)
Interlocked.Increment(ConcurrencyCount)
Interlocked.Increment(ExecutionCount)
log.LogInformation("VB.Net Concurrency:{0} Message:{1} Execution count:{2}", ConcurrencyCount, message, ExecutionCount)
' Wait for a bit to force some consurrency
Thread.Sleep(5000)
Interlocked.Decrement(ConcurrencyCount)
End Sub
End Class
As well as counting the number of executions I also wanted to check that >1 instances were started to process messages when the queues had many messages. I added a “queues” section to the hosts.json file so I could tinker with the options.
Imports System.Threading
Imports Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs
Imports Microsoft.Extensions.Logging
Public Class TimerTrigger
Shared executionCount As Int32
<FunctionName("Timer")>
Public Shared Sub Run(<TimerTrigger("0 */1 * * * *")> myTimer As TimerInfo, log As ILogger)
Interlocked.Increment(executionCount)
log.LogInformation("VB.Net TimerTrigger next trigger:{0} Execution count:{1}", myTimer.ScheduleStatus.Next, executionCount)
End Sub
End Class
The source code for the C# and VB.Net functions is available on GitHub